Quantcast
  • ~ How to Use the New Software ~

    Try logging in and if it is not accepting your password,, look to the bottom right corner of page for Contact Us and send a message.

Comparing Pure Latakias

Help Support Brothers of Briar:

Brunello

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Messages
266
Reaction score
25
Like any other piper who has been at this long enough, I've tried dozens of Latakia blends and developed a few favorites along the way. Some of those favorites are no longer available, like Ashton's Celebrated Sovereign or the original Balkan Sobranie, but there are also new favorites like C&D Black Frigate and Da Vinci.

To better understand the nature of the beast I finally decided to do a one-day comparison of every pure 100% Latakia I had in my blending cupboard: Ehrlich's Pure Syrian, McConnell's Pure Latakia, Sutliff TS18 Blending Latakia, and two pure, unprocessed Cyprian Latakias from LeafOnly.com and WholeLeafTobacco.com

What I found is that none of these straight 100% Latakias were anywhere near as potent as some well-known Lat-Bombs like Pirates Kake, Gaslight, or Nightcap. Evidently there is a lot of latitude in how lightly or heavily the Turkish leaves are smoked when making Latakia. I think that when a 100% Latakia is milder than a blend with 50% Latakia we need to move the discussion beyond percentage points. Latakia by itself, while one-dimensional, doesn't have to be forbiddingly potent. I think it becomes so when pressed into flakes with other robust tobaccos.

Finally, I have found in my own blending experiments that Syrian and Virginias work well together but that Cyprian seems to work better with Burley. But again, grades, casing, and many other factors come into play.
 

Ozark Wizard

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2014
Messages
6,557
Reaction score
5
I've always had a preference to Syrian over Cyprus. And I agree with you on the idea of various grades of Latakia.
 

RSteve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
292
Reaction score
56
Brunello":fp7d652x said:
To better understand the nature of the beast I finally decided to do a one-day comparison of every pure 100% Latakia I had in my blending cupboard: Ehrlich's Pure Syrian, McConnell's Pure Latakia, Sutliff TS18 Blending Latakia, and two pure, unprocessed Cyprian Latakias from LeafOnly.com and WholeLeafTobacco.com ...  Evidently there is a lot of latitude in how lightly or heavily the Turkish leaves are smoked when making Latakia. I think that when a 100% Latakia is milder than a blend with 50% Latakia we need to move the discussion beyond percentage points. Latakia by itself, while one-dimensional, doesn't have to be forbiddingly potent.
I've created blends using Peter Stokkebye Blending Latakia, Gawith & Hoggarth Blending Latakia and Cornell & Diehl Latakia. I made the mistake of thinking that they all probably sourced the latakia from the same processor. On a ten point scale, rating both the smokiness and intensity of the tobacco, the Stokkebye rates a 4, Gawith a 6 and the C & D a solid 10. I usually blend with the Stokkebye, both out of habit and because it's pretty inexpensive. When it hasn't been available I've used the others, but made a critical error using the C & D, as it absolutely dominated the blend. I had no idea that it would differ so greatly from the P.S.
 

Brunello

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Messages
266
Reaction score
25
RSteve":nrwvydku said:
Brunello":nrwvydku said:
To better understand the nature of the beast I finally decided to do a one-day comparison of every pure 100% Latakia I had in my blending cupboard: Ehrlich's Pure Syrian, McConnell's Pure Latakia, Sutliff TS18 Blending Latakia, and two pure, unprocessed Cyprian Latakias from LeafOnly.com and WholeLeafTobacco.com ...  Evidently there is a lot of latitude in how lightly or heavily the Turkish leaves are smoked when making Latakia. I think that when a 100% Latakia is milder than a blend with 50% Latakia we need to move the discussion beyond percentage points. Latakia by itself, while one-dimensional, doesn't have to be forbiddingly potent.
I've created blends using Peter Stokkebye Blending Latakia, Gawith & Hoggarth Blending Latakia and Cornell & Diehl Latakia. I made the mistake of thinking that they all probably sourced the latakia from the same processor. On a ten point scale, rating both the smokiness and intensity of the tobacco, the Stokkebye rates a 4, Gawith a 6 and the C & D a solid 10. I usually blend with the Stokkebye, both out of habit and because it's pretty inexpensive. When it hasn't been available I've used the others, but made a critical error using the C & D, as it absolutely dominated the blend. I had no idea that it would differ so greatly from the P.S.
Excellent info - very helpful! I've never tried the G&H just because I'm always worried about any residual Lakeland tastes. I agree on the C&D, and by extension some of the G.L. Pease blends derived from the same source - they are the most potent on the market and have to be used in extreme moderation. Among bulk offerings Sutliff is well behaved, but for the best quality I like McConnell Pure Latakia which doesn't have the overt casing that MacBaren has.
 
Top