Idlefellow
Well-known member
I need to rant somewhere so here goes: I sent out a piece of my original artwork as a holiday greeting. A friend was quite taken with the image and asked where he could buy a print of it, so I produced one, framed it, packed it well, and gifted it to him. I sent it Priority Mail which includes $50 automatic insurance. It arrived with the glass broken but otherwise OK. He took the item and the packaging to his local post office and the clerk said, "Yep, it's broken all right. We don't know much about claims; we've never processed one. The shipper will have to file a claim."
I knew this not to be correct but to save my friend the hassle I filed a claim on line. Per their request I included the shipping info, photos of the damaged item and packaging which my friend sent to me, and a signed statement of the value of the item which was far greater than the $50 claim. It was almost immediately declined; the reasons? The item 1) "had not been surrendered for examination:, and 2) "no statement of value had been provided." I appealed, saying that the local post office had indeed examined the item, and that I had provided a statement of value. I then got a letter saying that we would need to submit a form (#?) to prove that the item had been examined and that the statement of value needed to be a receipt, sales slip, etc. So my friend trudged to the PO again, where he was told that in order to get this completed form the item would need to be surrendered to them, and that if the claim was paid he probably would not get it back,
So, I wrote a letter relaying that we did take the item to the local post office and received no help, that only the glass was broken and that my friend didn't want to give up the print and the frame which is worth far more than the claim amount, and that there was no receipt, etc. as it was a gift and that I, as the artist, am surely entitled to provide a value of my own original work.
Yesterday I got a letter saying that the decision had not changed, and that the reasons were that the item was not surrendered and the proof of value was not a valid sales slip etc. yada yada yada.
I wouldn't have taken it this far over 50 bucks except for the principle, and as much as it burns me to give up I'm done with it; can't fight city hall as they say. If I had it to do over I would have had my friend surrender a box of broken glass without the print or the frame and made up some sort pf phony receipt! Rant over, but still p!ssed.
So, if you send a gift to someone and expect to collect the insurance, make sure you keep the receipt!
I knew this not to be correct but to save my friend the hassle I filed a claim on line. Per their request I included the shipping info, photos of the damaged item and packaging which my friend sent to me, and a signed statement of the value of the item which was far greater than the $50 claim. It was almost immediately declined; the reasons? The item 1) "had not been surrendered for examination:, and 2) "no statement of value had been provided." I appealed, saying that the local post office had indeed examined the item, and that I had provided a statement of value. I then got a letter saying that we would need to submit a form (#?) to prove that the item had been examined and that the statement of value needed to be a receipt, sales slip, etc. So my friend trudged to the PO again, where he was told that in order to get this completed form the item would need to be surrendered to them, and that if the claim was paid he probably would not get it back,
So, I wrote a letter relaying that we did take the item to the local post office and received no help, that only the glass was broken and that my friend didn't want to give up the print and the frame which is worth far more than the claim amount, and that there was no receipt, etc. as it was a gift and that I, as the artist, am surely entitled to provide a value of my own original work.
Yesterday I got a letter saying that the decision had not changed, and that the reasons were that the item was not surrendered and the proof of value was not a valid sales slip etc. yada yada yada.
I wouldn't have taken it this far over 50 bucks except for the principle, and as much as it burns me to give up I'm done with it; can't fight city hall as they say. If I had it to do over I would have had my friend surrender a box of broken glass without the print or the frame and made up some sort pf phony receipt! Rant over, but still p!ssed.
So, if you send a gift to someone and expect to collect the insurance, make sure you keep the receipt!