Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community
The Round Table
Gun control in Switzerland
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="puros_bran" data-source="post: 90898" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>One thing to remember HM.. Dover is in the Law Enforcement field..he will see things that will make a normal person throw up.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And interesting you bring up cops beating a down syndrome person.. Contrary to what Babylon has programmed us to believe that is exactly the type of tyranny that the Second Amendment is designed to suppress.. The ability to defend myself from/ bring harm upon other citizens is a secondary and unassociated argument from either perspective... The original intent (from what I gather) was to provide the citizen the ability to defend himself from/bring harm upon the State. It was intended that the State would fear the people, not that the people would fear the State.</p><p>How twisted that the tables have turned so far that the actual verbalization of that thought places the citizen in danger of the tyranny of the State.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="puros_bran, post: 90898, member: 10"] One thing to remember HM.. Dover is in the Law Enforcement field..he will see things that will make a normal person throw up. And interesting you bring up cops beating a down syndrome person.. Contrary to what Babylon has programmed us to believe that is exactly the type of tyranny that the Second Amendment is designed to suppress.. The ability to defend myself from/ bring harm upon other citizens is a secondary and unassociated argument from either perspective... The original intent (from what I gather) was to provide the citizen the ability to defend himself from/bring harm upon the State. It was intended that the State would fear the people, not that the people would fear the State. How twisted that the tables have turned so far that the actual verbalization of that thought places the citizen in danger of the tyranny of the State. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community
The Round Table
Gun control in Switzerland
Top