Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Pipe Tobacco From 2007 Onward
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="puros_bran" data-source="post: 457459" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>I really don't see pipe tobacco different that cigars, cigarettes, chew, dip, Snus. It's all tobacco use. </p><p></p><p>I do see ecigs as different.. And I think it was a huge mistake to ever call them e'cigs'. They aren't tobacco, the primary component used is not tobacco, and the nicotine used is but a small component of tobacco.</p><p>Nicotine in and of itself is not carcinogenic. Listing ecigs with known carcinogens is a travesty and it is going to lead to people dying of cancer that otherwise would not have. </p><p>Harm reduction doesn't matter to the zealot... "It produces something that looks like smoke and it calms cravings, it must be banned"</p><p></p><p></p><p>Edited in: Ever heard of 'divide and conquer'? When they came for the cigs the rest of the tobacco users should have stood shoulder to shoulder and told them to piss off... Instead everyone hunkers down and says "as long as they aren't bothering my small segment I don't care." Well, everyone cares now. It was delusional to think they wouldn't come for us when they were through ravaging the others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="puros_bran, post: 457459, member: 10"] I really don't see pipe tobacco different that cigars, cigarettes, chew, dip, Snus. It's all tobacco use. I do see ecigs as different.. And I think it was a huge mistake to ever call them e'cigs'. They aren't tobacco, the primary component used is not tobacco, and the nicotine used is but a small component of tobacco. Nicotine in and of itself is not carcinogenic. Listing ecigs with known carcinogens is a travesty and it is going to lead to people dying of cancer that otherwise would not have. Harm reduction doesn't matter to the zealot... "It produces something that looks like smoke and it calms cravings, it must be banned" Edited in: Ever heard of 'divide and conquer'? When they came for the cigs the rest of the tobacco users should have stood shoulder to shoulder and told them to piss off... Instead everyone hunkers down and says "as long as they aren't bothering my small segment I don't care." Well, everyone cares now. It was delusional to think they wouldn't come for us when they were through ravaging the others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Pipe Tobacco From 2007 Onward
Top