Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community
The Round Table
Quitting cigarettes with other forms of tobacco
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Burley" data-source="post: 374546" data-attributes="member: 1690"><p>Well, I'm hardly one to respond to this since I have never felt the need for justification to smoke, I just do it, but it would seem that switching to a practice of less or next-to-zero inhaling would be beneficial. I have never understood how inhaling one, two, or three packs of cigarettes a day for decades doesn't "cause" cancer sooner than it does. The indication seems to be that the weed is relatively harmless, at least compared to self-inflicted gunshots or something. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>In any event, let's assume that the statistical correlations are correct, that the lack of proof of causality can be overlooked, and that overdoing anything at all can be a bad idea. Moderation by any means seems like a winner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Burley, post: 374546, member: 1690"] Well, I'm hardly one to respond to this since I have never felt the need for justification to smoke, I just do it, but it would seem that switching to a practice of less or next-to-zero inhaling would be beneficial. I have never understood how inhaling one, two, or three packs of cigarettes a day for decades doesn't "cause" cancer sooner than it does. The indication seems to be that the weed is relatively harmless, at least compared to self-inflicted gunshots or something. ;) In any event, let's assume that the statistical correlations are correct, that the lack of proof of causality can be overlooked, and that overdoing anything at all can be a bad idea. Moderation by any means seems like a winner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community
The Round Table
Quitting cigarettes with other forms of tobacco
Top