Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Some thoughts on "Match" blends
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimInks" data-source="post: 425991" data-attributes="member: 2673"><p>The Lane Limited version of ERR is not the same even though they claim they used the original formula. It has more cocoa and less molasses, and is short ribbon cut instead of being ready rubbed. I like it, but it's not ERR. Sutliff's ERR Match is closer, though it isn't exact. The cut is different, but the flavor is more molasses than cocoa, with a shade less depth. Here's my review of the new Lane version: <a href="http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t30528-jim-s-lane-limited-ready-rubbed-review" target="_blank">http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t30528-jim-s-lane-limited-ready-rubbed-review</a></p><p></p><p>Even though it's true that it's virtually impossible to exactly match old blends (Russ Ouellette said it's the hardest thing to blend), Sutliff does have several that come pretty darn close. Here's a link to my Match review thread for those who missed it:</p><p><a href="http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t29479-jim-s-sutliff-match-reviews" target="_blank">http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t29479-jim-s-sutliff-match-reviews</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimInks, post: 425991, member: 2673"] The Lane Limited version of ERR is not the same even though they claim they used the original formula. It has more cocoa and less molasses, and is short ribbon cut instead of being ready rubbed. I like it, but it's not ERR. Sutliff's ERR Match is closer, though it isn't exact. The cut is different, but the flavor is more molasses than cocoa, with a shade less depth. Here's my review of the new Lane version: [url=http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t30528-jim-s-lane-limited-ready-rubbed-review]http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t30528-jim-s-lane-limited-ready-rubbed-review[/url] Even though it's true that it's virtually impossible to exactly match old blends (Russ Ouellette said it's the hardest thing to blend), Sutliff does have several that come pretty darn close. Here's a link to my Match review thread for those who missed it: [url=http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t29479-jim-s-sutliff-match-reviews]http://brothersofbriar.forumotion.com/t29479-jim-s-sutliff-match-reviews[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Some thoughts on "Match" blends
Top