Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Suggestions for large bulk storage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alfredo_buscatti" data-source="post: 282353" data-attributes="member: 36"><p>When my cellar was at its height I probably had 200 pint jars filled religiously with only 4 oz of tobacco. SG and GH flakes I would cut in half. I did this for the same reason as Yak stated, but it took up a lot of room. I am still a proponent of uninterrupted aging, as to me the more constant a process is, the better the results will be. But I am no judge of this. I've never had two jars, same size, same tobacco, same amount of that tobacco, aged for the same period of time, one interrupted and one not; never smoked from these jars; and given my palate, if I did I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.</p><p></p><p>Fast forward to the last few months. Given that I read over and again that aging will occur differently in these two cases but that both will produce comparable aging results, I'm cramming as much tobacco in pints as they can hold, about a half pound in each. Pressure causes heat; again don't ask me why. I leave headspace to give aerobic aging what it needs and seal the jar.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alfredo_buscatti, post: 282353, member: 36"] When my cellar was at its height I probably had 200 pint jars filled religiously with only 4 oz of tobacco. SG and GH flakes I would cut in half. I did this for the same reason as Yak stated, but it took up a lot of room. I am still a proponent of uninterrupted aging, as to me the more constant a process is, the better the results will be. But I am no judge of this. I've never had two jars, same size, same tobacco, same amount of that tobacco, aged for the same period of time, one interrupted and one not; never smoked from these jars; and given my palate, if I did I wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Fast forward to the last few months. Given that I read over and again that aging will occur differently in these two cases but that both will produce comparable aging results, I'm cramming as much tobacco in pints as they can hold, about a half pound in each. Pressure causes heat; again don't ask me why. I leave headspace to give aerobic aging what it needs and seal the jar. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Suggestions for large bulk storage
Top