Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Why are aros so disrespected?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="puros_bran" data-source="post: 418399" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>Of course Lakelands are aromatics. I've argued with some on here in the past on that very matter. Look it's base processed tobaccos, with substance added to enhance flavor and aroma. </p><p></p><p>On the other hand I disagree with the argument that "all tobaccos have casings therefore all tobaccos are aromatics". For one I don't know of a single person in the industry that agrees with that statement. Secondly, it's a ridiculous assertion that casings applied to all tobaccos in processing are some how equal to post processing applications. </p><p></p><p>Aromatics have the reputation they have because the casings and toppings are often applied to inferior tobaccos. Such is not the case with the offerings from McClellands, GH&Co, GL Pease, Esoterica, and on and on. Is it fair? I don't know, maybe? With such winners like Walnut and Kentucky Club in the English category I guess we shouldn't be to quick to toss entire categories under the bus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="puros_bran, post: 418399, member: 10"] Of course Lakelands are aromatics. I've argued with some on here in the past on that very matter. Look it's base processed tobaccos, with substance added to enhance flavor and aroma. On the other hand I disagree with the argument that "all tobaccos have casings therefore all tobaccos are aromatics". For one I don't know of a single person in the industry that agrees with that statement. Secondly, it's a ridiculous assertion that casings applied to all tobaccos in processing are some how equal to post processing applications. Aromatics have the reputation they have because the casings and toppings are often applied to inferior tobaccos. Such is not the case with the offerings from McClellands, GH&Co, GL Pease, Esoterica, and on and on. Is it fair? I don't know, maybe? With such winners like Walnut and Kentucky Club in the English category I guess we shouldn't be to quick to toss entire categories under the bus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Why are aros so disrespected?
Top