Breaking News

Brothers of Briar

Help Support Brothers of Briar:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
gandalfpc":zuy6yf6p said:
And certainly those that would operate inside such a conspiracy would simply push the man in front of a bus to keep things quiet and not have to worry about the public courts at all.
Now this makes the most sense to me out of all of them.

Yak, you're saying the "MAN" squashed his thumb on the Judges of the UK?

I mean the Conspiracy is that it was the US Govt. who did this to it's own people,
What kind of pull does the US govt. have over a UK Judge?

Don't you feel even a little ashamed you fall for this stuff?

Domestic Terrorism at best :clown: 
 
You are envisioning this as a tiny cabal of Snidely Whiplash bad guys scheming and plotting to get over on the Dudley Doright majority. That model does not correspond with the behavior of the System as a whole over hundreds of years.

Do you honestly think that judges are not part and parcel of the System as a whole, with a vested interest (a literal one, beginning with bank stock) in keeping the money flowing by perpetuating business as usual ?  

Really ?

All you need is a top-down system where subordinates either keep their mouths shut and do what they're told or else, and a smaller number of executives who personally benefit from following the particular page of the unwritten but well understood script that determines what they do and how they do it.

In other words, exactly what we've got now.

If you don't consider the system as a system, it's as if you're watching as the Soviet army invades Hungary and wondering which individuals in it are "the bad guys."

When you're looking at social insects, you're not dealing with individual bees or ants, but with hives and colonies.

:face:
 
^^^THIS!

Agree or disagree with Yak's perspective - I think this is one of the best presented arguments I have read in a long time.:cheers: 

Fraternally

Jers
 
Yak's my friend.   I still think he's full of crap sometimes, and other times, he's got it down pat.  I can only hope he feels the same about me.  Regardless, the questioning of a viewpoint as it stands is the colony or the hive, because a single ant doesn't do much.  The way the System(s) work is not a 1960s villain-and-hero tale, it's a well-oiled (sometimes) machine that gets strength from that which is not obvious.   That's by design.  

There's three kinds of people in the world... Controllers (the few, at different rungs of the ladder), Subordinates (the proud; ignorantly or purposefully), and the Awake (the ugly, unpopular crazies).  Now, it's been this way for a long time in varying degrees, but the checks-and-balances of both the citizens and even other countries made this work, roughly.   Didn't matter if it was tribes of Natives on the American Plains or ships fulla conquering white folk.   The problem is, there's no where else to go.  We know the confines of our planet and its resources.   Much of it is visibly finite.   So, alter the visibility, fog the outlook, mask the truth.  Keep people doing as they are "supposed to" for as long as possible.   It's for our own good, right?   :) 

When something odd leaks out, it's worth pondering.   The Banking/Corporatist society to which we're all part of, like it or not, cannot be the only option.  It hides behind world events, catastrophes (invented or real), political titles, judicial decisions and distracts/controls us with cheap garbage and bad food.    One thing the System has a point about is blaming us...that any dissatisfaction is actually our fault...their solution is, buy more, reach more, dream more.   Another solution is, do more, learn more, be more--the problem may not be our fault, the lack of solution choice is.  

A judge making a decision might be a drop in the bucket, it might be a dead-end, or crap, but sometimes it's worth checking out.   It's better than a steady diet of cable news, sitcoms, arguing over the new OS of your iWhatever, pretending you own your leased car or borrowed home.    I hope, anyway!   :)  I can't plug back into the Matrix now, no matter how much I'd prefer it.

8)
 
Whoa! I think i finally get it, in order to distract me from the truths they made folks who believe in this crap to humor me...... thanks guys, I'm distracted already you can quit now
 
If the pendulum swings hard enough to one side, it's bound to smash into the other.

Split the difference, start somewhere. Indulge facts, expect lies. <img class="emojione" alt="?" title=":shrug:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/emojione/assets/png/1f937.png?v=2.2.7"/> Take nothing to heart except that which you find useful and sensible. (Thanks, Bruce Lee).

8)
 
Sensible logical thinking guides me through each day , but I suppose this is where I'll be told that's exactly what they want me to think
 
I dunno. Maybe? :lol:

Depends on what you do when all contingencies are realized. Questioning things for a long time has left me with some very relaxed, clear thoughts. It ain't all worth freaking out over as much as it is just realizing 1 + 1 = 2, and when sometimes it is said to be 3, being inquisitive and open-minded. And of course, rational. :heart:

8)
 
Now that's where it gets confusing cause rationally 1+1=2, I don't care how opened minded you are it never equals 3
 
Look at it from this angle, BC. The Wall Street link : that whole process is controlled by lawyers & judges (= more lawyers) and determined by political hacks (even more lawyers). Cut to the chase and call it an American Bar Association production.

No crime -- no matter how flagrant -- can be prosecuted without them, and none of the thousands of horrendous Wall Street crimes have been prosecuted. Or ever will be.

One maverick, the Attorney General of New York, announced he was going to go after the worst of them and, Bingo !  He's forced to resign in a "sex scandal."

If that isn't a flagrant example of the legal system following marching orders, there is no such thing.

Laws are for the little people.

:face:
 
Those crimes are public knowledge.

Response = total inertia.

That tells me everything I need to know.

:face: 
 
BigCasino":436rrqxm said:
Now that's where it gets confusing cause rationally  1+1=2, I don't care how opened minded you are it never equals  3
WMD + Iraq = War


  1    +    1  =   3


Fraternally

Jers
 
Jers":0b0a5y8j said:
BigCasino":0b0a5y8j said:
Now that's where it gets confusing cause rationally  1+1=2, I don't care how opened minded you are it never equals  3
WMD + Iraq = War


  1    +    1  =   3


Fraternally

Jers
And there it is. :D

...algebraically-speaking, when you have the answer, you can never assume you know the equation. That's what the news is for, taking an answer and supposing the method used to get there. Being who they are, news/media is both not very smart mixed with multifaceted agenda (or just in it for themselves).

When an answer is given, and a totally different equation is proposed, never assume. I once heard a meme, "Trust, but verify." I go with "Verify, if possible, and keep the door unlocked." (...just in case someone needs to be brought in--or kicked out).

8)
 
Recent statistics show that the economy is getting even worse.

This is because (choose one) :

1) The Democrats are running it into the ground.

2) The Republicans won't go along with the Democratic proposals.

Clearer ? Choose your Bad Guy & attack. ;) 

:face: 



 
Older gent once told me:

"Wanna know why there's really only two political parties these days? Too many people can't count as high as three."

That in mind, keep the equation the same, but change the answer, and most people probably won't even notice.

8)
 
Top