Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Proposed Template for Narrative Reviews of Pipe Tobaccos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kilted1" data-source="post: 58297" data-attributes="member: 540"><p>I guess by that reasoning, everyone should drive a FORD! </p><p></p><p>What Pipe Forum is the oldest? We should all participate only there! </p><p></p><p>My ONLY mention of TR was in my first response and that I had reviews there.</p><p></p><p>I discussed having considered (with the help of a fellow enthusiast) creating another site and the criterion we were considering and why. There are in fact several places where there are reviews of tobacco and pipe related products. Does simply mentioning them here equate to subversion? Who am I supposed to be subverting?</p><p></p><p>I'm not overthrowing anyone, or forcing conformity or snobbery or anything else. If anything, an optional (in this case) template(s) might serve to engage more participation in an even deeper understanding of our hobby, and encourage some folks to participate in a (for them) deeper way. I'm absolutely baffled as to how this threatens anyone or subverts TR or anyone else's work.</p><p></p><p>You seem to have trouble taking me at my word, so be it.</p><p></p><p>Be well!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kilted1, post: 58297, member: 540"] I guess by that reasoning, everyone should drive a FORD! What Pipe Forum is the oldest? We should all participate only there! My ONLY mention of TR was in my first response and that I had reviews there. I discussed having considered (with the help of a fellow enthusiast) creating another site and the criterion we were considering and why. There are in fact several places where there are reviews of tobacco and pipe related products. Does simply mentioning them here equate to subversion? Who am I supposed to be subverting? I'm not overthrowing anyone, or forcing conformity or snobbery or anything else. If anything, an optional (in this case) template(s) might serve to engage more participation in an even deeper understanding of our hobby, and encourage some folks to participate in a (for them) deeper way. I'm absolutely baffled as to how this threatens anyone or subverts TR or anyone else's work. You seem to have trouble taking me at my word, so be it. Be well! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
Proposed Template for Narrative Reviews of Pipe Tobaccos
Top