Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
The Nanny State, Part DEux
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Brothers of Briar:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bosun1" data-source="post: 304477" data-attributes="member: 2766"><p>Following Yak's excellent article. Watching the news this AM. The media were extolling the virtues of the many cameras that were involved in surveillance of the public in the area of the Boston terrorist attack. I'm sure that they don't want to use the word 'surveillance' but would rather use 'public safety' so we don't start to think of military drones over our amber waves of grain.</p><p>Went over the cost & quality per camera, etc. and how helpful they've been in tracking down criminals. Wait till Bloomberg levies a 'public safety tax' for surveillance cameras to augment the citizens right to safety, privacy be damned!</p><p>If any of our British brethren care to comment on cameras/police/government surveillance in their "Nanny State" please do!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bosun1, post: 304477, member: 2766"] Following Yak's excellent article. Watching the news this AM. The media were extolling the virtues of the many cameras that were involved in surveillance of the public in the area of the Boston terrorist attack. I'm sure that they don't want to use the word 'surveillance' but would rather use 'public safety' so we don't start to think of military drones over our amber waves of grain. Went over the cost & quality per camera, etc. and how helpful they've been in tracking down criminals. Wait till Bloomberg levies a 'public safety tax' for surveillance cameras to augment the citizens right to safety, privacy be damned! If any of our British brethren care to comment on cameras/police/government surveillance in their "Nanny State" please do! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Pipes & Tobacco
Tobacco Discussion Forum
The Nanny State, Part DEux
Top